Fundamento jurídico: 27. La Cour rappelle que la règle de l’épuisement des voies de recours internes doit s’appliquer avec une certaine souplesse et sans formalisme excessif, mais elle n’exige pas seulement la saisine des juridictions nationales compétentes et l’exercice de recours destinés à combattre une décision litigieuse déjà rendue qui viole prétendument un droit garanti par la Convention. Elle oblige aussi, en principe, à soulever devant ces mêmes juridictions, au moins en substance et dans les formes et délais prescrits par le droit interne, les griefs que l’on entend formuler par la suite au niveau international (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Fressoz et Roire c. France [GC], no 29183/95, § 37, CEDH 1999-I ; Azinas c. Chypre [GC], n o 56679/00, § 38, CEDH 2004-III).
[Idioma original]
El Tribunal reitera que la regla del agotamiento de los recursos internos debe aplicarse con cierta flexibilidad y sin excesivo formalismo, pero no solo exige que el caso se presente ante los tribunales nacionales competentes y que se interpongan recursos para impugnar una decisión impugnada ya dictada que presuntamente vulnera un derecho garantizado por el Convenio. También exige, en principio, que las denuncias que posteriormente se pretendan plantear a nivel internacional se planteen ante esos mismos tribunales, al menos en cuanto al fondo y en las formas y plazos prescritos por el derecho interno (véanse, entre otras muchas jurisprudencias, Fressoz y Roire c. Francia [GC], n.º 29183/95, § 37, CEDH 1999-I; Azinas c. Chipre [GC], n.º 56679/00, § 38, CEDH 2004-III).
[Traducción de LP]
CONSEIL
DE L’EUROPE
COUNCIL
OF EUROPE
COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
COURT (CHAMBER)
CASE OF KOKKINAKIS v. GREECE
(Application no. 14307/88)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
25 May 1993
In the case of Kokkinakis v. Greece,
The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, in accordance with Article 43 (art. 43) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms («the Convention») and the relevant provisions of
the Rules of Court, as a Chamber composed of the following judges:
Mr R. RYSSDAL, President,
Mr R. BERNHARDT,
Mr L.-E. PETTITI,
Mr J. DE MEYER,
Mr N. VALTICOS,
Mr S.K. MARTENS,
Mr I. FOIGHEL,
Mr A.N. LOIZOU,
Mr M.A. LOPES ROCHA,
and also of Mr M.-A. EISSEN, Registrar, and Mr H. PETZOLD, Deputy
Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 27 November 1992 and 19 April 1993, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights («the Commission») on 21 February 1992, within the three- month period laid down in Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 14307/88) against the Hellenic Republic lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art.25) by a Greek national, Mr Minos Kokkinakis, on 22 August 1988.
The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby Greece recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46). The object of the request was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Articles 7, 9 and 10 (art. 7, art.9, art. 10).
[Continúa…]
